Up until now in this series my approach
has been to present what works: the set of practices which, when put
together into a package, allow communities to last a long time—in
some cases, for many centuries. Many readers found this exposition
useful, while others found some of the practices disagreeable. This
week I will now take the opposite approach, and concentrate on what
has been proven to not work, or to work very badly. In a
follow-up to the previous post, which expounded on the superiority of
communism in both production and consumption when it practiced at the
scale of the commune, I now present a chapter I rather freely
translated from Peter Koropotkin's Anarchy,
which explains how such experiments fail socially in spite of their
initial success in achieving self-sufficiency.
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Interview on People First Radio
Author Dmitry Orlov says that if financial, commercial, and political collapse are met with appropriate responses, the more extreme aspects of social and cultural collapse could be prevented... (Read more)
Download mp3 directly.
Download mp3 directly.
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
The Sea Gypsy Tribe Start-up Manual
[This is a guest post from Ray, who sailed off from San Francisco some years ago and has been living as a sea gypsy ever since. Sea gypsies have a lot going for them: relative self-sufficiency and self-reliance, camaraderie, competence, mobility and plenty of free, open habitat where they can roam freely.]
“I
believe that if there is a near extinction catastrophe, a sea gypsy tribe has
the best chance of both surviving and replenishing the human population in the
wisest manner.”
For those of you who may not have read that article, I encourage you to do so before continuing with this one. THAT piece provides the “why to” background information for my belief that economic, energy and ecological disasters are very possible in our near future. It then suggests that various sea gypsy tribes scattered about the planet provide an excellent survival and re-seeding option. THIS article provides the basic “how to” information for anyone who was inspired by my message, and would like to join our movement. My sense is that there are three potential types of candidates. I refer to them as Seekers, Converts and Recruits.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Communities that Abide—Part III
![]() |
| Alexander Kosolapov |
There are two organizing principles
that self-sufficient communities can rely on in order to succeed:
communist organization of production and communist organization of
consumption. Both of these produce much better results for the same
amount of effort, and neither is generally available to the larger
society, which has to rely on the far more wasteful market-based or
central planning-based mechanisms, both of which incur vast amounts
of unproductive overhead—bankers, traders and regulators in the
case of market-based approaches, and government bureaucrats and
administrators in the case of centrally planned approaches. History
has shown that market-based approaches are marginally more efficient
than centrally planned ones, but neither one comes anywhere near the
effectiveness of communist approaches practiced on the small scale of
a commune.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Interview on What Now with Ken Rose
Most memorable moment:
Ken: So do you think humanity can come together as one family, or is that hopelessly naïve?
Me: It's hopelessly naïve.
Listen to it here.
Ken: So do you think humanity can come together as one family, or is that hopelessly naïve?
Me: It's hopelessly naïve.
Listen to it here.
Tuesday, July 09, 2013
Communities that Abide—Part II
![]() |
| Byigor Morski |
This series of articles is dedicated to
the idea that there is much that can be
learned from the practices of communities that manage to persist over
the long term with their cultures or subcultures remaining largely
intact. Such communities can provide everything their members
need—housing, nutrition, education, medicine, entertainment,
companionship, social security and, perhaps most important of all, a
sense of belonging. While their specific practices may be alien to
us, their commonalities should not be.
Monday, July 08, 2013
Dave Pollard's Review of The Five Stages of Collapse
I've just finished reading Dmitry Orlov’s new book The Five Stages of Collapse. It made me realize that I have probably been making two fundamental errors in my thinking about how our civilization/culture will collapse, and what we should do to become more resilient in the face of that collapse (taking steps like learning new personal and collective capacities, and re-learning how to create communities).
More...
More...
Tuesday, July 02, 2013
Communities that Abide—Part I
![]() |
| Married to the Sea “Everyone” |
In thinking through where we are and
what awaits us, there is a very basic, simple, obvious question we
can ask: Does our society work for us or against us? The US, regarded as a single
community, that is; does it still function as such? Does it provide
safety, security, a sense of belonging, freedom from necessity and want, meaningful opportunities to
care for others, and to be cared for in return? Or has it become a
cold, savage, alienating place watched over by the ubiquitous
surveillance state and held together by “law and order” and the
implicit threat of violence?
Friday, June 28, 2013
Ugo Bardi: Dr. Orlov's Report
Sometimes, when you read a book, something rings in your head; something
that requires a little work to identify but that, in the end, comes out
loud and clear. This was the case for me with the latest book by Dmitry
Orlov. It reminded me of something and, eventually, I found out what it
was. It was one of the many stories by Jorge Luis Borges, “Dr. Brodie's
report” (El relato de Brodie); the description of the barbarous customs and the cruel culture of the African tribe of the Hrn; as
observed by Dr. Brodie. The Five Stages of Collapse describes instead
the barbarous customs and the cruel culture of the tribe of the “Middle Class Westerners” as observed by Dr. Orlov.
It must be said that Orlov and Borges write in very different styles: sometimes Orlov's brilliance hides his depth while, at times, Borges' depth hides his brilliance. And while Borges remains in the allegoric tradition that goes back to Johnathan Swift and his “Yahoos,” Orlov goes direct to his real subject: modern society. But there are points in common. Orlov, like Borges, doesn't hide any of the grim details of what he describes and both Borges and Orlov show a certain sympathy and kindness toward their subject. There are many ways of being human and the great virtue of people such as Orlov and Borges is the capability of appreciating all of them.
More...
It must be said that Orlov and Borges write in very different styles: sometimes Orlov's brilliance hides his depth while, at times, Borges' depth hides his brilliance. And while Borges remains in the allegoric tradition that goes back to Johnathan Swift and his “Yahoos,” Orlov goes direct to his real subject: modern society. But there are points in common. Orlov, like Borges, doesn't hide any of the grim details of what he describes and both Borges and Orlov show a certain sympathy and kindness toward their subject. There are many ways of being human and the great virtue of people such as Orlov and Borges is the capability of appreciating all of them.
More...
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
The Tapernanke has spoken
![]() |
| Kevin Best |










